Thanks for logging in.

You can now click/tap WATCH to start the live stream.

Thanks for logging in.

You can now click/tap LISTEN to start the live stream.

Thanks for logging in.

You can now click/tap LATEST NEWS to start the live stream.

LISTEN
Watch
on air now

Create a 3AW account today!

You can now log in once to listen live, watch live, join competitions, enjoy exclusive 3AW content and other benefits.


Joining is easy.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Coronial inquest raises questions over tensions between GPs and pharmacists

Ross and Russel
Article image for Coronial inquest raises questions over tensions between GPs and pharmacists

A coronial inquest into the death of a Melbourne grandfather has raised questions about what the course of action should be when a GP and a pharmacist disagree on medication.

A report in today’s Age details how the 77-year-old’s pharmacist raised concerns with the doctor about the dosage.

Pharmacist and 3AW health commentator Gerald Quigley told 3AW Breakfast pharmacists are the guardians of medication.

“The person who outranks both is the patient,” he said.

“In the general discussion, the doctor is the person who takes the course of action they want to take.

“If the pharmacist believes it is not in the best interest of the patient, or put the patient at risk, you’ve sometimes got to stick to your digs.”

He said a pharmacist can refuse to dispense medication if they have concerns.

Click PLAY to hear 3AW Breakfast

Ross and Russel
Advertisement